the  economy,  directing  free  financial  resources  of 
enterprises  and  the  population  into  the  domestic 
economy,  including  investment  purposes.  A  sharp 
decline in the share of lending, including investment 
lending, in active banking operations and an increase 
in  income  from  speculative  operations  negatively 
affect  the  economic  security  of  the  state.  However, 
given the  significant growth in  the  banking sector's 
profits, we  can  speak of  an  increase in  the  security 
potential of the financial sector of the economy with 
the  existing  assessment  methods.  Thus,  the 
strategically  wrong  accents  and  the  infrastructure 
system  begins  to  work  for  itself,  in  spite  of  its 
intended role in the national security system. Taking 
into account the requirements for building a security 
system in the state, there is a conflict: the goals (tasks) 
of a lower level (specific market participants) begin 
to conflict with the goals of a higher (national) level. 
Only the state can correct this situation, having 
clearly  defined  the  target  guidelines  for  building  a 
system of economic security of economic entities. 
Another  component  of  the  problems  is  the 
assessment of  economic  security at the micro-level. 
This issue is natural, since the process of making 
decisions on ensuring economic security begins with 
the  diagnostic  stage.  Its  effectiveness  is  determined 
by  the  methodological  approaches  and  techniques 
that the analyst uses in this activity. 
At  present,  with  a  wide  variety  of  methods  for 
diagnosing  economic  security  systems  of  economic 
entities, the main application is methods of indicator 
assessment. Within this approach, the main questions 
are about the indicators used for diagnostic purposes 
and  their  thresholds.  The  most  commonly  used 
indicators  are  for  assessing  the  financial  condition 
and  use  of  financial  resources.  According  to  some 
authors  (Sergeeva,  2019,  Karanina,  Ryazanova, 
Gritsuk,  2018,  Klychova,  Zakirova,  Dyatlova, 
Klychova,  Zaugarova,  Zalyalova,  2019),  the  most 
preferred  indicators  are  for  assessing  liquidity, 
financial stability, turnover and profitability. On the 
basis of partial deviations from the threshold values,it 
is  possible  to  get  an  integral  indicator,  while 
researchers offer different approaches to determining 
the  weight  coefficients  (scores)  that  define  the 
contribution  of  each  indicator  to  the  overall 
assessment  of  the  level  of  economic  security 
(Azarenko, 2017). 
Another common approach to assessing the level 
of  economic  security  is  the  approach  tested  in  risk 
management  technology.  The  variety  of  methods 
existing  here  can be  summarized  by qualitative  and 
quantitative  interpretation  of  risks.  Some  authors 
propose a methodology for integral risk assessment, 
where the materiality of risk is taken as a weighting 
indicator  (Aleksandrov,  2019).  There  are  other 
approaches  to  assessing  the  level  of  economic 
security:  an  integrated  approach  that  basically 
combines  an  indicator  approach  and  an  approach 
based on risk diagnostics; bankruptcy diagnostics and 
others. 
However,  practical  experience  with  various 
methods does not give the analyst satisfying results. 
The main reasons of it are the following. First of all, 
such  a  widespread  approach  requires  an  objective 
selection of evaluation criteria for the organization's 
activities in the safety mode, and a set of indicators 
that  determine  each  of  the  criteria.  It  is  simply 
illogical  to  use  here  standard  approaches  without 
taking into account the specifics of the organization's 
activities.  But  the  problem  is  associated  with  the 
threshold values of indicators, which, in some cases, 
should have a completely different meaning than the 
generally accepted one. For example,  the autonomy 
coefficient for trade enterprises, and in some cases, it 
is  simply  impossible  to  establish  threshold 
(normative) values. However, from a methodological 
point  of  view,  the  described situation  is  even  more 
problematic. 
For the stage of assessing the actual  state  of the 
economic  security  of  an  enterprise,  using  the 
indicator  method  is  extremely  convenient.  It 
determines its widespread distribution. There are also 
information  bases  that  allow  to  get  the  initial 
information. Its users can be third parties interested in 
the assessment, for example, creditors. But after all, 
analysis and assessment is the basis for planning, in 
this  case  based  on  a  system  of  indicators. 
Unfortunately, in the practice of domestic enterprises, 
such planning often leads to "technocratic methods of 
correcting  the  values  of  indicators",  substituting 
tactical decisions for the strategy of forming a system 
of economic security. Moreover, taking into account 
the  frequency  of  forming  credentials,  the  safety 
management process is more reminiscent of episodic 
decisions of a spontaneous nature to bring individual 
security  subsystems  into a  stable state.  Considering 
that  the  balance  sheet  data  is  a  state  of  the 
organization on a specific date, which does not reflect 
the actual dynamics in the development of the system, 
it is necessary to switch to assessing the dynamics of 
indicators.  It  is  also  advisable  for  domestic 
enterprises  to  select  those  indicators  which  help  to 
more  clearly  assess  the  state  of  security.  Each 
industry needs its own threshold values of indicators, 
since the goal is to achieve an optimal level of safety. 
In the next section of the article, we substantiate these 
proposals  giving  an  example  of  the  financial