
 
between the electrodes 2/9. However, this deviation 
is within the limits of the experimental accuracy. A 
linear decrease of the potential with a decrease in d 
is observed (not shown). Additionally, it is important 
to note the underlying unknown shift and scaling of 
the voltage signal in the vertical direction. This is 
due to the impact of the high pass filter of the pre-
amplifier on the MHD signal.  
 
 
Figure 1: EP catheter positioning in the phantom and its 
orientation with respect to the flow velocity v, the external 
magnetic field B, and the Lorentz force F
L 
(a), and 
experimental setup (b). 
4 DISCUSSION 
The investigation of MHD potentials detected with 
common EP equipment is important for developing 
EP exam procedures in a MR environment. 
Therefore, a MRI compatible flow circuit was 
successfully established. The linear dependency 
between the measured potential and d (as well as B
0
, 
both not shown) predicted by theory was clearly 
observed and validates the model system. Typical 
electrode distances as between the electrodes 5/6 
revealed a significant MHD potential which cannot 
be neglected. The non-conductive walls of the flow 
phantom are not expected to bias the outcome of the 
measurement significantly since studies revealed 
that vessel wall conductivity may be neglected 
(Abdallah et al., 2008). Further investigations will 
analyse the impact of different recording modalities 
such as hardware filters on the detection of the MHD 
signal. Furthermore, glycerol will be added to the 
saltwater for simulating the viscosity and the density 
of blood. 
The time course of MR velocity data at the 
catheter position (not shown) agrees very well with 
the EP-Tracer data (apart from filter effects). Hence, 
additional simple and quick MR flow measurements 
at the location of interest during an EP exam may be 
used to remove the MHD related potential from 
intracardiac ECG signals representing an essential 
step towards diagnostically valuable data. 
Additionally, in vivo data, e.g. from animal models, 
is required for the validation of these methods.
 
 
 
Figure 2: MHD potential time course. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
EUROSTARS Program Grant #01QE1004D. 
REFERENCES 
Abdallah, D. A., Drochon, A., Robin, V., Fokapu, O., 
2008. Magnetohydrodynamic flow of blood: Influence 
of the simplifying assumptions in calculations. J. of 
Biomechanics 41 (S1), S269. 
Gupta, A., Weeks, A. R., Richie, S. M., 2008. Simulation 
of elevated T-waves of an ECG inside a static 
magnetic field (MRI). IEEE transactions on 
biomedical engineering 55 (7), 1890-96. 
Josephson, M. E., 2008. Clinical cardiac electro-
physiology techniques and interpretations, Lippincott 
Williams & Wilkins. Philadelphia, 4
th 
edition. 
Schneider, Ch., 2005. Das EPU-Labor, Steinkopff Verlag. 
Würzburg. 
Tenforde, T. S., Gaffey, C. T., Moyer, B. R., Budinger, T. 
F., 1983. Cardiovascular alterations in Macaca 
monkeys exposed to stationary magnetic fields: 
Experimental observations and theoretical analysis. 
Bioelectromagnetics 4, 1-9.  
Tenforde, T. S., 2005. Magnetically induced electric fields 
and currents in the circulatory system. Progress in 
Biophysics & Molecular Biology 87, 279-288. 
Tse, Z. T. H., Dumoulin, C. L., Watkins, R., Byrd, I., 
Schweitzer, J., Kwong, R. Y., Michaud, G. F., 
Stevenson, W. G., Schmidt, E. J., 2012. MRI-
compatible voltage-based electro-anatomic mapping 
system for cardiac electrophysiological interventions. 
In 20
th
 ISMRM, oral presentation #206.