Ralf Knackstedt, Karsten Klose, Björn Niehaves, Jörg Becker



IS literature provides a variety of Data Warehouse development methodologies focussing on technical issues, for instance the automatical generation of Data Warehouse or OLAP schemata from conceptual graphical models or the materialization of views. On the other hand, we can observe a growing influence of conceptual modelling in the move of general IS development which is specifically addressing early phase design issues. Here, conceptual modelling solves communicational problems which emerge when for instance IT personnel and business personnel work together, mostly having distinct educational and professional backgrounds as well as using distinct domain languages. Thus, the aim of this paper is to provide the foundation of a Data Warehouse development methodology in form of a process reference model which is based on a conceptual modelling approach.


  1. Ackoff, R. L., 14 (1967), S. B-147 bis B-156., 1967. Management Misinformation Systems. Management Science, 14 (1), B 147-156.
  2. Bulos, D., 1996. A New Dimension. OLAP Database Design. Database Programming & Design, 9 (6), 33- 37.
  3. Devlin, B., 1997. Data Warehouse. From Architecture to Implementation. Reading, UK et al.
  4. Golfarelli, M., Maio, D. and Rizzi, S., 1998. The Dimensional Fact Model - A Conceptual Model for Data Warehouse. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 7 (2-3), 215-246.
  5. Golfarelli, M. and Rizzi, S., 1999. Designing the Data Warehouse: Key steps and crucial issues. Journal of Computer Science and Information Management, 2 (3).
  6. Hackney, D., 1997. Understanding and Implementing Successful Data Marts. Reading, UK et al.
  7. Hahn, K., Sapia, C. and Blaschka, M., 2000. Automatically Generating OLAP Schemata from Conceptual Graphical Models. In Proceedings of the ACM Third International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP (DOLAP 2000), Washington D. C., USA, 10. November 2000.
  8. Hammergren, T., 1996. Data Warehousing. Building the Corporate Knowledge Base. London, UK et al.
  9. Hirschheim, R., Klein, H. and Lyytinen, K., 1995. Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge/MA.
  10. Holten, R., 2003. Specification of Management Views in Information Warehouse Projects. Information Systems, 28 (7), 709-751.
  11. Holten, R., Dreiling, A. and Schmid, B., 2002. Management Report Engineering - A Swiss Re Business Case. In From Data Warehouse to Corporate Knowledge Center (E. Maur and R. Winter Ed.), 421- 437, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany et al.
  12. Inmon, W. H., Imhoff, C. and Sousa, R., 1998. Corporate Information Factory. New York/NY, U.S.A. et al.
  13. Kamlah, W. and Lorenzen, P., 1973. Logical Propaedeutic. Lanham/MD.
  14. Kamlah, W. and Lorenzen, P., 1996. Logische Propädeutik. Vorschule des vernünftigen Redens. 3 Edition. Stuttgart, Weimar.
  15. Keen, P. G. W., 1980. MIS Research: Reference Disciplines and a Cumulative Tradition. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information SystemsEd.), 9-18, Philadelphia/PA.
  16. Martin, E. W., 1983. Information Needs of Top MIS Managers. MIS Quarterly, 7 (3), 1-11.
  17. Mingers, J., 2001. Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research, 12/2001/3, 240-259.
  18. Munro, M. C. and Davis, G. B., 1977. Determing Management Information Needs: A Comparision of Methods. MIS Quarterly, 1 (2), 55-67.
  19. Niehaves, B., 2004. A Framework for Analysing the Epistemological Assumptions of Research Methods. In Proceedings of the Innovation Through Information Technology. 2004 IRMA International Conference (M. Khosrow-Pour Ed.), 57-60, New Orleans/LA, U.S.A.
  20. Niehaves, B., Klose, K., Knackstedt, R. and Becker, J., 2005. Epistemological Perspectives on ISDevelopment - A Consensus-Oriented Approach on Conceptual Modeling. Accepted for the Second International Workshop on Philosophy and Informatics (WSPI 2005), Ulm, Germany.
  21. Poe, V., 1996. Building a Data Warehouse for Decision Support. New Jersey.
  22. Riebel, P., 1979. Gestaltungsprobleme einer zweckneutralen Grundrechnung. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 31 (1), 863-893.
  23. Rockart, J. F., 1979. Chief Executives define their own Data Needs. Harvard Business Review, 30 (Mar-Apr), 81-93.
  24. Sapia, C., Blaschka, M., Höfling, G. and Dinter, B., 1998. Extending the E/R Model for the Multidimensional Paradigm. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Data Warehouse and Data Mining (DWDM'98), 105-116, Singapur, 19.-20. November 1998.
  25. Sethi, V. and Teng, J. T. C., 1988. Choice of Information Requirements Analysis Method: An Integrated Approach. INFOR, 26 (1), 1-16.
  26. Szyperski, N., 1980. Informationsbedarf. In Handwörterbuch der Organisation (E. Grochla Ed.), 904-913, 2. Ed. Stuttgart.
  27. Tarski, A., 1944. The Semantic Concept of Truth and the foundation of semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4/1944, 341-375.
  28. Wedekind, H., 1992. Datenbanksysteme I. Eine konstruktive Einführung in die Datenverarbeitung in Wirtschaft und Verwaltung. 2. Ed. Mannheim et al.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Knackstedt R., Klose K., Niehaves B. and Becker J. (2005). PROCESS REFERENCE MODEL FOR DATA WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT - A consensus-oriented approach . In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 972-8865-19-8, pages 499-505. DOI: 10.5220/0002534104990505

in Bibtex Style

author={Ralf Knackstedt and Karsten Klose and Björn Niehaves and Jörg Becker},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
SN - 972-8865-19-8
AU - Knackstedt R.
AU - Klose K.
AU - Niehaves B.
AU - Becker J.
PY - 2005
SP - 499
EP - 505
DO - 10.5220/0002534104990505