COMPARISON OF FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY CYTOLOGICAL IMAGE SEGMENTATION METHODS

Maciej Hrebień, Piotr Steć, Józef Korbicz

2007

Abstract

This paper describes an early stage of cytological image recognition and presents a comparision of two hybrid segmentation methods. The analysis includes the Hough transform with conjunction to the watershed algorithm and with conjunction to the active contours techniques. One can also find here a short description of image pre-processing and an automatic nucleuses localization mechanisms used in our approach. Preliminary experimental results collected on a hand-prepared benchmark database are also presented with short discussion of common errors and possible future problems.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Hrebień M., Steć P. and Korbicz J. (2007). COMPARISON OF FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY CYTOLOGICAL IMAGE SEGMENTATION METHODS . In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 4: ICINCO, ISBN 978-972-8865-83-2, pages 305-310. DOI: 10.5220/0001645603050310

in Bibtex Style

@conference{icinco07,
author={Maciej Hrebień and Piotr Steć and Józef Korbicz},
title={COMPARISON OF FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY CYTOLOGICAL IMAGE SEGMENTATION METHODS},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 4: ICINCO,},
year={2007},
pages={305-310},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0001645603050310},
isbn={978-972-8865-83-2},
}

in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 4: ICINCO,
TI - COMPARISON OF FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY CYTOLOGICAL IMAGE SEGMENTATION METHODS
SN - 978-972-8865-83-2
AU - Hrebień M.
AU - Steć P.
AU - Korbicz J.
PY - 2007
SP - 305
EP - 310
DO - 10.5220/0001645603050310