HUMANS DIFFER: SO SHOULD MODELS - Systematic Differences Call for Per-subject Modeling

Wolfgang Heidl, Stefan Thumfart, Christian Eitzinger

2012

Abstract

While machine learning is most often learning from humans, training data is still considered to originate from a uniform black box. Under this paradigm systematic differences in training provided by multiple subjects are translated into unavoidable modeling error. When trained on a per-subject basis those differences indeed translate to systematic differences in the resulting model structure. We feel that the goal of creating humanlike capabilities or behavior in artificial systems can only be achieved if the diversity of humans is adequately considered.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Heidl W., Thumfart S. and Eitzinger C. (2012). HUMANS DIFFER: SO SHOULD MODELS - Systematic Differences Call for Per-subject Modeling . In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART, ISBN 978-989-8425-95-9, pages 413-418. DOI: 10.5220/0003832904130418

in Bibtex Style

@conference{icaart12,
author={Wolfgang Heidl and Stefan Thumfart and Christian Eitzinger},
title={HUMANS DIFFER: SO SHOULD MODELS - Systematic Differences Call for Per-subject Modeling},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART,},
year={2012},
pages={413-418},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003832904130418},
isbn={978-989-8425-95-9},
}

in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART,
TI - HUMANS DIFFER: SO SHOULD MODELS - Systematic Differences Call for Per-subject Modeling
SN - 978-989-8425-95-9
AU - Heidl W.
AU - Thumfart S.
AU - Eitzinger C.
PY - 2012
SP - 413
EP - 418
DO - 10.5220/0003832904130418